Monday, February 25, 2013
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
>>>>> Lecture: Models
>>>>>Wednesday February 20th at 13.00 Lecture Models by Chris Thurlbourne
Big Auditorium
Thursday, February 14, 2013
>>>>>[P1] The Williamsburg Trilogy/ Constructing a scenario [3]
>>>>>[P1.3] Program/ Constructing a strategy:
>>>Duration: 2 weeks
>>There is no
architecture without action, no architecture without events, no architecture
without program (…)<<[1]
Bernard Tschumi
Architecture and
Disjunction
Cedric Price, Diagram mapping program and community for Inter-Action Centre London
1977 [2]
>>To what extent
could the literary narrative shed light on the
organization of events in
buildings, whether called "use",
"functions", "activities" or "programs"? If writers could
manipulate
the structure of stories in the same way as they
twist vocabulary and grammar,
couldn't architects do the
same, organizing the program in a similarly
objective, detached, or imaginative way? For if architects could self-consciously
use such devices as repetition, distortion, or
juxtaposition in the formal
elaboration of walls, couldn't
they do the same thing in terms of the
activities that occurred
within those very walls? Pole vaulting in the chapel,
bicycling in the laundromat, sky diving in the elevator shaft?
Raising these
questions proved increasingly stimulating:
conventional organizations of spaces
could be matched to
the most surrealistically absurd sets of activities. Or
vice
versa: the most intricate and perverse organization of spaces could
accommodate the everyday life of an average suburban family(…)<< [3]
Bernard Tschumi
Architecture and
Disjunction
Very often the significance of
program had been neglected and
reduced to mere functional aspect and list of specific requirements. However, program involves complex readings and
reciprocal relationships. Taking into consideration the existing conditions and
the explored potentials of the site, as well as the requirements of our
clients/users we will seek to elaborate different strategies for organizing and
accommodating these matters and data as a program-
i.e. to explore how these issues can be processed spatially. Thus, we will
focus on program in terms both of
spatial and functional conditions, as well as events, scenarios, or
atmospheres. You will be asked to develop mixed organisms that respond to definition of hybrid buildings, as these “enjoy dense and fruitful atmospheres, which
favour the natural appearance of unexpected activities”[4].
The scale of the proposal and the
diversity of uses are up to you. However, it should be based on the premise
that at least 50% of its area will be dedicated to housing.
Bearing this in mind, we will
take as a point of the departure a pilot initiative launched in July 2012 by the
New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD)- adAPT NYC. The aim of this program is to
develop a new model of housing adapted to the City’s changing demographics. It defines
so-called micro-unit that measures
25-35 m2, as an innovative apartment model which includes a kitchen
and a bathroom that are smaller than what is allowed under current regulations. [ http://www.nyc.gov/html/hpd/html/developers/HPD-adAPT-NYC-RFP.shtml]
>>(…)Sociability
The ideal hybrid feeds on the meeting of the private and public
spheres. The intimacy of
private life and the sociability of public life
find anchors of development in the hybrid building.
The permeability of the
hybrid makes it accessible from the city and the private use of its
services
extends its timetable to 24 hours a day. This means that activity is constant
and
is not controlled by private or public rhythms. Another use category is created,
a full-time
building.(…)
Programmes
The mixing of uses in a
hybrid building generates a potential which is transferred, as in a
system of
connected vessels, to those weaker activities so that all involved are
benefited.
Hybrid buildings are organisms with multiple interconnected
programmes, prepared to
house both planned activities as well as those
unplanned activities in a city(…).<<
Javier Mozas [5]
Henceforward you will be
asked to work in teams of 2, and to define and quantify different uses according to your mappings and
reflections on the site, existing and imagined scenarios, events, conflicts and
potentials.
Keywords: [scale]
[area] [high] [form] [materiality] [ambient conditions] [orientation] [atmosphere]
[cycle] [events]
> Catalogue of situations
and spaces + diagram of connections, interrelations and cycles
> Collage- using existing
examples (plan 1:100)
> Diagrammatic models of
the program focusing on interrelations and spatial conditions (1:200)
> First colonization of the site/ plan + section
1:100 + working models
[1] TSCHUMI, Bernard: Architecture and disjunction, MIT Press, 1996,
pg. 121
[2] in: GARCIA, Mark (ed.): The Diagrams of Architecture, AD Readers, Wiley, 2010, pg. 215
[3] Ibid. pgs. 146-147
[4] MOZAS, Javier: ’This is a Hybrid… and also this’ in A+T Hybrids II – Low-Rise Mixed-Use-Buildings FERNANDÉZ PER, Aurora; MOZAS, Javier, ARPA, Javier (eds.), pg. 5
[5] MOZAS, Javier: ’Mixed uses- A Historical overview’ in A+T Hybrids II – Low-Rise Mixed-Use-Buildings FERNANDÉZ PER, Aurora; MOZAS, Javier, ARPA, Javier (eds.) pgs. 23-25
Sunday, February 10, 2013
>>>>>Monday Lectures
>>>>> Monday February 11th at 10.00 Lecture Thresholds & Transitions by Stephen Willacy.
Big Auditorium
>>>>> Monday February 11th at 13.00 Lecture Diagrams by Tine Nørgaard
>>>>> Monday February 11th at 13.00 Lecture Diagrams by Tine Nørgaard
Big Auditorium
Friday, February 8, 2013
>>>>>[P1] The Williamsburg Trilogy/ Constructing a scenario [2]
>>>>> [P1.2] Who? What? Why?/ Constructing Fiction
>>>Duration: 1 week
Designs
for clothes (Teddy Tinling) for the ‘inhabitants’ of the House of the Future by
Alison and Peter Smithson 1956 [1]
>>(…) To live is to leave traces," writes Walter Benjamin,
discussing the birth
of the interior, "In the interior these are
emphasized. An abundance of
- covers and protectors, liners and cases is
devised, on which the traces
of objects of everyday use are imprinted. The
traces of the occupant
also leave their impression on the interior. The
detective story that
follows these traces comes into being. . . . The criminals
of the first
detective novels are neither gentlemen nor apaches, but private
members
of the bourgeoisie."
There is an interior in
the detective novel. But can there be a detective
story of the interior itself,
of the hidden mechanisms by which space is
constructed as interior? Which may
be to say, a detective story of
detection itself, of the controlling look, the
look of control, the controlled
look. But where would the traces of the look be
imprinted? What do we
have to go on? What clues?(…)<<[2]
Beatriz Colomina
Privacy and Publicity
The detective story is a vehicle
for observing, following, recording, unraveling habits and discovering traces left
by characters. Both writers and architects construct places- using different
mediums. In the first stage, the architect uses representational tools as a
means to generate new scenarios-
construct new realities. In 1955 The Daily Mail newspaper sponsored the Daily Mail Ideal Home Exhibition in
London, Alison and Peter Smithson were commissioned to design the future house.
In this set-up they had to imagine also the future users. During the
exhibition, hired models- dressed by designer Teddy Tinling – in the role of
the inhabitants, performed the future
life- the way the house worked.
You will also be asked to define
characters- Mr./Mrs. Black or Mr./Mrs. White who will reside in a
place that responds to the peculiarities of their activities. They may either
be a real person you met during the visit to the site or totally unknown. Using
your Atlas [P1.1]- you will be asked
to (re)-construct the narrative about the site, involving the characters and
responding to the questions Who?
(characters) What? (diagnostic) Why? (arguments) and presenting your story,
both through text and visually (video,
which should not exceed 2 minutes and drawing/collage).
>> (…)Like
Jarmusch's
earlier work, it is about relationships, and chance encounters (though in this
case the various groups inhabiting the
three rooms don't actually meet - even
though some of them are acquainted with one another - but pass on, blissfully
unaware of
the others proximity). Like his previous two features, it shows a
fascination with changing light as an index of time and place [...]. It also
serves,
to some extent, as a playful exercise in genre: its three parts may be
viewed as offbeat variations on the romantic comedy, the ghost story, and the
crime thriller.
[…]
The result of Jarmusch revealing
the connections between
all these disparate elements only gradually is not only that we are forced into
the position of having
to investigate the 'mystery' of the narrative - to piece
together the jigsaw, as it were - for ourselves; it also means we are
continually required to reassess the meaning of what we have already
seen and
heard, as people, places, events, sounds, objects and
sounds recur in different
contexts or are shown from different
perspectives. The film, then, explores,
and makes explicit, both
the fundamental methods of cinematic storytelling and
the
experience of watching and understanding a film: in each activity, meaning
is derived by positing some sort of relationship between characters, actions,
objects, sounds, time and
place, and alters precisely according to the changes
that occur within those very relationships.(…) << [3]
Geoff Andrew
Mystery Train, Jim Jarmusch
[1] In: RISSELADA Max; HEUVEL van den, Dirk (eds.): Alison & Peter Smithson: From a House of
the Future to a House of Today, 010 Publishers, Rotterdam, 2004, pg. 95
[2] COLOMINA, Beatriz: Privacy and Publicity: Modern Architecture as Mass Media, MIT Press, 1996, pg. 234.
[3]ANDREW, Geoff: Stranger Than Paradise: Maverick Film-Makers in Recent American Cinema, Limelight Editions; 1st Edition, 2004, p. 151 - 152
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)